Up until now, Paul's letters have been to congregations, religious communities, but today's letters (and others) are written to individuals, in this case Timothy. Since we have been reading in the New Testament, we know a little about Timothy. He was a young man who had a Jewish mother and a Greek father, he traveled with Paul, and was much beloved by him.
Now I'm going to tell you something that might seem a little confusing: some scholars don't think that Paul wrote this letter.
They believe this because of some of the subjects Paul discusses: the particular church controversies he mentions and the qualifications for bishops, for example. And may I suggest that if this is Paul, the tone of the letter is much more staid and (ahem) establishment-sounding than some of the earlier letters that we read. There's not as much passion in this letter, although there's still a concern for good order and Truth.
Then there's the pronouncements regarding women's leadership in chapter two. In Galatians, Paul states that "in Christ there is no male or female," in 1 Timothy he writes that a "wife" or a "woman" should learn quietly in complete submission. (As well, we are not to wear elaborate hairstyles, or gold, pearls or expensive clothes.) What are we to make of this?
As a woman, I'm wondering why some churches adhere so strongly to the position that women are to remain silent in the church, but not to the other requirements that women should not wear jewelry or expensive clothes. Because it seems to me that both of the things that Paul is concerned about have to do with the culture of the time, and what sort of behavior would adversely affect the Christian community and its witness.
I can't help but noticing that most of this part of the letter (we'll see what develops tomorrow) deals with how to manage the household of faith: husband and wives, bishops and pastors, servants and masters. Yet I'm drawn to the simple statement of faith in chapter 1, which is worth the weight of the whole letter, "Jesus Christ came into the world to save sinners." Paul goes on to say that he's the biggest sinner of all -- and his whole life is an object lesson of God's mercy.
There's something about this sentence that makes me smile.
Our whole lives an object lesson of God's mercy. Maybe that's enough for me.
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Friday, August 10, 2012
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Day 26: Necessary to Suffer and to Enter into His Glory
Jesus is sent to Pilate, and then to Herod, and then to the crowds, and then crucified. We've been through this now twice before. And yet....
Did you notice that when Herod and Pilate meet, they become friends? Formerly, Luke says, they were enemies, but as of today, they became friends. Hmmmm. What do you suppose that means?
When Simon helps Jesus carry his cross, Jesus has words for the women of Jerusalem, who follow him, weeping. "Weep for yourselves," he warns them. On Jesus' Last Day, he flashes forward to another Last Day that is coming: the destruction of Jerusalem.
In Matthew and Mark, the only words that Jesus says from the cross are these: "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?" (Mark takes the trouble to translate it into Aramaic.) These words are a verse from Psalm 22, it's true, and if you read the whole lamenting Psalm, you will find comfort and hope there. But still, this is called The Cry of Dereliction for a reason.
Luke reports three different words from the cross: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do." (to those who are crucifying him), "Today you shall be with me in Paradise" (to the repentant thief), and "Father, into your hands I commit my Spirit." These words form a much different picture than the one in Matthew and Mark.
As in every single resurrection story, the women come to the tomb. They are so frightened when they see the angels that they fall on their faces. And, here's a twist: when they try to tell the disciples what they saw and heard, the disciples consider their words to be "nonsense." (in other translations: an idle tale.) By the way, did you know that in ancient times, a woman's testimony was not accepted in a court of law?
Everyone has favorite Bible stories: I happen to really like Matthew's account of Jesus and Peter walking on the water. The next story, about the two disciples walking to Emmaus, is close second. The story is full of surprise, humor and irony. The disciples are walking with Jesus and learning from him, but they don't know it. I imagine Jesus trying to keep a straight face when he asks them to tell him the story of the things that have happened during the past week. "Really?" he says. "Is that so?" And the two disciples begging the stranger to stay with them, and finally recognizing him once he breaks the bread. Then they run back to Jerusalem to tell the other disciples, who have the same news to share, "We have seen the Lord!"
Really, the brief recounting of Jesus' ascension is pretty anti-climactic after this. But, when we get to Luke's 2nd volume, (his second "orderly account"), we'll get a fuller version.
That would be Acts. Keep your finger in the page. We have one more gospel before we return to Luke's story.
Did you notice that when Herod and Pilate meet, they become friends? Formerly, Luke says, they were enemies, but as of today, they became friends. Hmmmm. What do you suppose that means?
When Simon helps Jesus carry his cross, Jesus has words for the women of Jerusalem, who follow him, weeping. "Weep for yourselves," he warns them. On Jesus' Last Day, he flashes forward to another Last Day that is coming: the destruction of Jerusalem.
In Matthew and Mark, the only words that Jesus says from the cross are these: "My God, My God, why have you forsaken me?" (Mark takes the trouble to translate it into Aramaic.) These words are a verse from Psalm 22, it's true, and if you read the whole lamenting Psalm, you will find comfort and hope there. But still, this is called The Cry of Dereliction for a reason.
Luke reports three different words from the cross: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do." (to those who are crucifying him), "Today you shall be with me in Paradise" (to the repentant thief), and "Father, into your hands I commit my Spirit." These words form a much different picture than the one in Matthew and Mark.
Everyone has favorite Bible stories: I happen to really like Matthew's account of Jesus and Peter walking on the water. The next story, about the two disciples walking to Emmaus, is close second. The story is full of surprise, humor and irony. The disciples are walking with Jesus and learning from him, but they don't know it. I imagine Jesus trying to keep a straight face when he asks them to tell him the story of the things that have happened during the past week. "Really?" he says. "Is that so?" And the two disciples begging the stranger to stay with them, and finally recognizing him once he breaks the bread. Then they run back to Jerusalem to tell the other disciples, who have the same news to share, "We have seen the Lord!"
Really, the brief recounting of Jesus' ascension is pretty anti-climactic after this. But, when we get to Luke's 2nd volume, (his second "orderly account"), we'll get a fuller version.
That would be Acts. Keep your finger in the page. We have one more gospel before we return to Luke's story.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Day 19: Jesus Preaches, Heals, Casts Out Demons....and Prays
You may find much of this section of Luke somewhat familiar, as many of the stories you have heard before, either in Matthew or in Mark, or in both. But, as you read along, you might notice some additions, some differences, and different things might leap out at you.
As for me, the controversy involved in Jesus healing on the Sabbath becomes more prominent. Jesus makes the point that it should be valid to save a life, even on the Sabbath (and in fact, the Jewish rabbis speak in favor of this), but the man with the withered hand did not have a life-endangering injury. So, something else may be going on. What is it?
You know what else I noticed? Jesus goes up the mountain to pray, and he prays all night long. You may notice references to Jesus praying often in Luke.
Then he chooses his apostles and goes back down the mountain to teach. That's right: it's not the Sermon on the Mount. It's called "The Sermon on the Plain." There are very many similarities between the Sermon on the Mount and the Sermon on the Plain. Luke's version is shorter (for example), and instead of simply saying "Blessed are the poor in spirit" for example, Jesus has three "Blesseds" and three "Woes." And forget about the "Poor in Spirit" -- Jesus says, "Blessed are you who are POOR." Not spiritual. Literally.
Jesus heals the centurion's servant, a story we might be familiar with. Then he balances that story with one about Jesus raising a widow's son from the dead. Luke is careful to include many stories about women in his gospel.
There's also the unnamed woman who anoints Jesus' feet with her tears while he's dining at Simon's house. She is identified as a "sinner", which leads many people to consider he to be a prostitute. Really, is prostitution the only sin open to women? Also, I still wonder about identifying people as "sinners." To me, it's like saying, that person is a "human being."
Mary Magdalene is named as one of the followers of Jesus at the beginning of Luke 8. Luke also mentions (without saying much more) that several women travelled with him and supported his ministry.
The next two stories are familiar ones: the man healed of a legion of demons (notice how the people want Jesus to leave after he does this great miracle?) and the little girl and the woman who are both healed. Unlike Mark, Luke doesn't portray Jesus' words to her in his native language of Aramaic, "Talitha cum."
As for me, the controversy involved in Jesus healing on the Sabbath becomes more prominent. Jesus makes the point that it should be valid to save a life, even on the Sabbath (and in fact, the Jewish rabbis speak in favor of this), but the man with the withered hand did not have a life-endangering injury. So, something else may be going on. What is it?
You know what else I noticed? Jesus goes up the mountain to pray, and he prays all night long. You may notice references to Jesus praying often in Luke.
Then he chooses his apostles and goes back down the mountain to teach. That's right: it's not the Sermon on the Mount. It's called "The Sermon on the Plain." There are very many similarities between the Sermon on the Mount and the Sermon on the Plain. Luke's version is shorter (for example), and instead of simply saying "Blessed are the poor in spirit" for example, Jesus has three "Blesseds" and three "Woes." And forget about the "Poor in Spirit" -- Jesus says, "Blessed are you who are POOR." Not spiritual. Literally.Jesus heals the centurion's servant, a story we might be familiar with. Then he balances that story with one about Jesus raising a widow's son from the dead. Luke is careful to include many stories about women in his gospel.
There's also the unnamed woman who anoints Jesus' feet with her tears while he's dining at Simon's house. She is identified as a "sinner", which leads many people to consider he to be a prostitute. Really, is prostitution the only sin open to women? Also, I still wonder about identifying people as "sinners." To me, it's like saying, that person is a "human being."
Mary Magdalene is named as one of the followers of Jesus at the beginning of Luke 8. Luke also mentions (without saying much more) that several women travelled with him and supported his ministry.
The next two stories are familiar ones: the man healed of a legion of demons (notice how the people want Jesus to leave after he does this great miracle?) and the little girl and the woman who are both healed. Unlike Mark, Luke doesn't portray Jesus' words to her in his native language of Aramaic, "Talitha cum."
Sunday, June 17, 2012
Day 17: The "Orderly Account" of Luke, beginning with Birth Announcements
Unlike Mark, but like Matthew, Luke begins well before the beginning of Jesus' ministry. He begins by telling us that he too is going to write about Jesus, and that his account is going to be an orderly one. He writes to tell someone called "Theophilos" about Jesus (by the way, Theophilos means "Lover of God".)
There's a combination of well-known and less-well-known stories in these first two chapters of Luke. I know I had the first few verses of Luke 2, the Christmas story, almost known by heart. But what about the story of Zechariah and Elizabeth, the parents of John the Baptist? Unlike Mary, Elizabeth and her husband were not young, but an older couple who had long ago given up hope that they would have a child. Like Mary, Zechariah meets an angel who tells him the good news, but he responds, "How will I know? After all, my wife and I are getting on in years...." To me, this is a nice way of saying, "Give me a break. How am I supposed to believe that?"
So the angel strikes him dumb until his son, John is born, (by the way, at the end of Luke 1.) Then, Zechariah goes on to praise God in words of prophecy and poetry. The church has made Zechariah's words into a song, called the "Benedictus."
Zechariah and Elizabeth's story forms the beginning and end of Luke 1. In the middle is Mary's story (I can't help saying -- there's the meat in the middle of the sandwich again.) Mary's response, "My soul magnifies the Lord..." I find striking in many ways, not the least because she speaks as if everything God has promised has already happened. "God has filled the hungry with good things, and sent the rich away empty." She is bringing the future into the present.
Then there is Luke 2, the story so familiar that maybe we don't pay attention to the details, the ones that are there, and the ones that are not there (for example, did you notice that there is no mention of Mary riding a donkey, and that Luke never mentions a star?)
In Luke 2, the angels proclaim, and then Anna and Simeon proclaim. Then, in the end, twelve-year-old Jesus loses his parents and ends up in the temple.
One thing to notice -- Luke is often careful to balance out men and women in stories about encounters with Jesus. So we see both the wisdom of Simeon and Anna. Pay attention to that as you read along.
Did you notice any different details in these familiar stories as you read them today? If so, what were they?
Why do you suppose Luke tells stories from before John the Baptist and Jesus were even born?
There's a combination of well-known and less-well-known stories in these first two chapters of Luke. I know I had the first few verses of Luke 2, the Christmas story, almost known by heart. But what about the story of Zechariah and Elizabeth, the parents of John the Baptist? Unlike Mary, Elizabeth and her husband were not young, but an older couple who had long ago given up hope that they would have a child. Like Mary, Zechariah meets an angel who tells him the good news, but he responds, "How will I know? After all, my wife and I are getting on in years...." To me, this is a nice way of saying, "Give me a break. How am I supposed to believe that?"
So the angel strikes him dumb until his son, John is born, (by the way, at the end of Luke 1.) Then, Zechariah goes on to praise God in words of prophecy and poetry. The church has made Zechariah's words into a song, called the "Benedictus."
Zechariah and Elizabeth's story forms the beginning and end of Luke 1. In the middle is Mary's story (I can't help saying -- there's the meat in the middle of the sandwich again.) Mary's response, "My soul magnifies the Lord..." I find striking in many ways, not the least because she speaks as if everything God has promised has already happened. "God has filled the hungry with good things, and sent the rich away empty." She is bringing the future into the present. Then there is Luke 2, the story so familiar that maybe we don't pay attention to the details, the ones that are there, and the ones that are not there (for example, did you notice that there is no mention of Mary riding a donkey, and that Luke never mentions a star?)
In Luke 2, the angels proclaim, and then Anna and Simeon proclaim. Then, in the end, twelve-year-old Jesus loses his parents and ends up in the temple.
One thing to notice -- Luke is often careful to balance out men and women in stories about encounters with Jesus. So we see both the wisdom of Simeon and Anna. Pay attention to that as you read along.
Did you notice any different details in these familiar stories as you read them today? If so, what were they?
Why do you suppose Luke tells stories from before John the Baptist and Jesus were even born?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)